| SatQ pressing query | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
steady now steady now The Navesink Banks
Posts : 3277 Join date : 2009-04-03 Location : England
| Subject: SatQ pressing query Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:52 pm | |
| Does anyone know which pressing of SatQ this is? | |
|
| |
Shrewsbury_Stars The Navesink Banks
Posts : 1512 Join date : 2010-05-06 Location : Back In The Swamps of Jersey
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:05 pm | |
| - steady now steady now wrote:
- Does anyone know which pressing of SatQ this is?
I'm fairly certain that's the current pressing. Sabot apparantly got rid of the "juke box" hole and changed the label a bit. | |
|
| |
StopAndSlideToTheRight I'da called you Woody
Posts : 601 Join date : 2011-01-17 Age : 28 Location : Norway
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:24 pm | |
| That's so much nicer than the old one! | |
|
| |
steady now steady now The Navesink Banks
Posts : 3277 Join date : 2009-04-03 Location : England
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:27 pm | |
| [quote="Shrewsbury_Stars"] - steady now steady now wrote:
- Does anyone know which pressing of SatQ this is?
I'm fairly certain that's the current pressing. Sabot apparantly got rid of the "juke box" hole and changed the label a bit. as the black US pressing is the unlimited one, would changing the label and 'hole' not make this a separate pressing? | |
|
| |
Shrewsbury_Stars The Navesink Banks
Posts : 1512 Join date : 2010-05-06 Location : Back In The Swamps of Jersey
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:56 pm | |
| [quote="steady now steady now"] - Shrewsbury_Stars wrote:
- steady now steady now wrote:
- Does anyone know which pressing of SatQ this is?
I'm fairly certain that's the current pressing. Sabot apparantly got rid of the "juke box" hole and changed the label a bit. as the black US pressing is the unlimited one, would changing the label and 'hole' not make this a separate pressing? I think this is a question for the completists but I would think so. | |
|
| |
steady now steady now The Navesink Banks
Posts : 3277 Join date : 2009-04-03 Location : England
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:35 pm | |
| I have now heard from Sabot about this.
The black vinyl shown above does indeed now replace the previous 'unlimited' version, of which they ended up pressing 3,551 copies. So that's a second black pressing then, though again nominally 'unlimited'. | |
|
| |
Shrewsbury_Stars The Navesink Banks
Posts : 1512 Join date : 2010-05-06 Location : Back In The Swamps of Jersey
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:59 pm | |
| - steady now steady now wrote:
- I have now heard from Sabot about this.
The black vinyl shown above does indeed now replace the previous 'unlimited' version, of which they ended up pressing 3,551 copies. So that's a second black pressing then, though again nominally 'unlimited'. Of the 3,551 previously pressed, I believe the first pressing of black was limited to 1,000. This is according to the 18milesaminute blog. | |
|
| |
steady now steady now The Navesink Banks
Posts : 3277 Join date : 2009-04-03 Location : England
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:49 am | |
| - Shrewsbury_Stars wrote:
- steady now steady now wrote:
- I have now heard from Sabot about this.
The black vinyl shown above does indeed now replace the previous 'unlimited' version, of which they ended up pressing 3,551 copies. So that's a second black pressing then, though again nominally 'unlimited'. Of the 3,551 previously pressed, I believe the first pressing of black was limited to 1,000. This is according to the 18milesaminute blog. if that site was still up to date and accurate, I wouldn't have bothered basing my page on that info but updating and correcting it that's why I don't show a limited first black pressing, because I understand that the black pressing in fact turned out to be the 'unlimited' one | |
|
| |
brucesboots I'da called you Woody
Posts : 965 Join date : 2009-09-05 Age : 62 Location : midlands uk
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:17 am | |
| so is this new pressing the one you would get from the Gaslight store ? | |
|
| |
Shrewsbury_Stars The Navesink Banks
Posts : 1512 Join date : 2010-05-06 Location : Back In The Swamps of Jersey
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:41 am | |
| - steady now steady now wrote:
- Shrewsbury_Stars wrote:
- steady now steady now wrote:
- I have now heard from Sabot about this.
The black vinyl shown above does indeed now replace the previous 'unlimited' version, of which they ended up pressing 3,551 copies. So that's a second black pressing then, though again nominally 'unlimited'. Of the 3,551 previously pressed, I believe the first pressing of black was limited to 1,000. This is according to the 18milesaminute blog. if that site was still up to date and accurate, I wouldn't have bothered basing my page on that info but updating and correcting it
that's why I don't show a limited first black pressing, because I understand that the black pressing in fact turned out to be the 'unlimited' one Now I'm confused. Below is our exchange from another thread. What am I missing? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- steady now steady now wrote: ouch! generally speaking, first pressing rarity still stands, even if records are re-pressed in the same colour Shrewsbury_Stars wrote: That's fair enough. So for something like the black 2x7 pressing of S&TQ on black, would that still be considered a first press limited to 1000 even though Sabot has repressed the black version? I realize what a nerd this makes me but I really enjoy discussing this stuff. steady now steady now wrote: yes, the first press would still be limited, because the re-pressing is, after all, a second pressing as for Elsie's second pressing of 500, as they don't seem to be sold with a 'second pressing' tag, are they really a separate pressing for collector's purposes? | |
|
| |
steady now steady now The Navesink Banks
Posts : 3277 Join date : 2009-04-03 Location : England
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:27 am | |
| - Shrewsbury_Stars wrote:
- steady now steady now wrote:
- Shrewsbury_Stars wrote:
- steady now steady now wrote:
- I have now heard from Sabot about this.
The black vinyl shown above does indeed now replace the previous 'unlimited' version, of which they ended up pressing 3,551 copies. So that's a second black pressing then, though again nominally 'unlimited'. Of the 3,551 previously pressed, I believe the first pressing of black was limited to 1,000. This is according to the 18milesaminute blog. if that site was still up to date and accurate, I wouldn't have bothered basing my page on that info but updating and correcting it
that's why I don't show a limited first black pressing, because I understand that the black pressing in fact turned out to be the 'unlimited' one Now I'm confused. Below is our exchange from another thread. What am I missing?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- steady now steady now wrote:
ouch!
generally speaking, first pressing rarity still stands, even if records are re-pressed in the same colour
Shrewsbury_Stars wrote:
That's fair enough. So for something like the black 2x7 pressing of S&TQ on black, would that still be considered a first press limited to 1000 even though Sabot has repressed the black version?
I realize what a nerd this makes me but I really enjoy discussing this stuff.
steady now steady now wrote:
yes, the first press would still be limited, because the re-pressing is, after all, a second pressing
as for Elsie's second pressing of 500, as they don't seem to be sold with a 'second pressing' tag, are they really a separate pressing for collector's purposes?
oooo; now I've confused myself I think when I answered I assumed that the re-pressing could be distinguished oh man, and I don't even collect variants | |
|
| |
brucesboots I'da called you Woody
Posts : 965 Join date : 2009-09-05 Age : 62 Location : midlands uk
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:34 pm | |
| Are we agreed that the 1st press black had the large juke box hole and the new press has the small regular hole or have i missed something ? | |
|
| |
steady now steady now The Navesink Banks
Posts : 3277 Join date : 2009-04-03 Location : England
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:18 pm | |
| - brucesboots wrote:
- Are we agreed that the 1st press black had the large juke box hole and the new press has the small regular hole or have i missed something ?
yes, we're agreed on that large juke box hole: 3,551 pressed regular hole: current 'unlimited' pressing | |
|
| |
brucesboots I'da called you Woody
Posts : 965 Join date : 2009-09-05 Age : 62 Location : midlands uk
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:54 pm | |
| - steady now steady now wrote:
- brucesboots wrote:
- Are we agreed that the 1st press black had the large juke box hole and the new press has the small regular hole or have i missed something ?
yes, we're agreed on that
large juke box hole: 3,551 pressed
regular hole: current 'unlimited' pressing Cheers......always said Bruce kept me poor. | |
|
| |
steady now steady now The Navesink Banks
Posts : 3277 Join date : 2009-04-03 Location : England
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:31 am | |
| by the way, the release date for this pressing is July 2011 | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: SatQ pressing query | |
| |
|
| |
| SatQ pressing query | |
|